April 5, 2010
Signing in the Rain
Finding a home for this record was a pain in the ass. Everyone I’ve played it for says it’s our best, most daring record yet, and still, all of the labels we admired that we thought would go for it wouldn’t touch it. Our former label Tomlab was not an option since we felt we needed better representation in North America, and it would have been nice to have been paid royalties without a fight for the past five years, although we can’t blame Tom personally for that… music sales are low and getting lower, of course, and the first streams to dry out are the cash flows of small labels. There were a number of sparks of support from key members of ‘major indie’ labels and our conversations with them were very promising, until we would find out after weeks of silence that it wasn’t going to happen. The story we kept hearing was as fascinating as it was disappointing… “our label is run by a democratic process and everyone on the team has to be on board for us to commit to a new artist.” Makes sense, superficially… everyone loves democracy, but the more i thought about it, the more i realized that that sounds like the perfect recipe for the homogenization of music. i don’t know any two people who agree about music, let alone a whole group of them, and at any rate, people who agree about everything are certainly not our target audience. So it’s probably for the best they won’t work with us.
This is probably the best description I’ve read of the “talking to labels about maybe getting signed” process. It’s a mystical thing, and it’s interesting to hear someone else’s experience with it. I actually think consensus makes sense if you’re trying to get the entire company behind something, and a bunch of creative people with differing opinions can still end up signing some truly weird stuff, and — perhaps more to the point of the above post — not signing some totally palatable MOR indie fare. But I can see where these guys are coming from, and it sounds like we’ve been on the receiving end of some pretty similar, occasionally frustrating emails.
This also functions as a pretty good State of the Indie Nation, at least in regards to independent record labels and the way bands experience them. From here, the band (The Books) considers self-releasing, and ends up going with a small label (Temporary Residence) basically just because they really like the guy behind it. All the bases are covered, from big indies to good and bad little indies, to no label at all.
Also, the guys in The Books sound like really cool people, which is absolutely not at all surprising. Their music radiates thoughtful decency and, as they put it later on in this post, “emotional intelligence.” Now their blog can do the same.
March 26, 2009
This is how the modern music industry works. Unfortunately, there is no guarantee for monetization. All you can do is become ‘followable’ and possibly ‘respected’/’critically acclaimed’, but that does not mean you have earned the right to ‘deserve to get paid for it.’
I have mixed feelings about this guy (he seems like a douche / he seems fairly bright) but this image and this paragraph are kinda on the money. It gets into some of the same ambiguity and unquantifiable-ness I was talking about regarding music videos, the “meme” economy being a big part of why people are still making them at this point. We’re all just trying to hold people’s attention really, and hoping everything will flow from there. Then again, that’s pretty much what marketing has always been, right?
July 31, 2008
“The biggest selling albums and songs are nearly always the most widely pirated, regardless of all the ‘anti-piracy’ tactics employed by music companies. Or, to sum up by paraphrasing an earlier argument, ‘popular music is popular everywhere it’s popular.”
June 7, 2008
The Hype Cycle →
Short, sharp overview of hype as it pertains to mass taste, mostly in the musical sphere. I like the tone here: quick and direct, without the blahsiness that usually haunts writing (and there’s not enough of it) on this subject. It’s depressing to think that something so powerful and personal (art/music) can be so totally sucked dry, but somehow just calling out the process and being aware of it kind of makes it feel less defeating. It’s there (hype), but it really is a silly game, when you think of it.
(As opposed to when you just get caught up and act on it without any real thought and intentionality, which I always find makes me feel like a total lemming / hollowed-out shell of a person. You know, like talking shit about something that’s totally in line with what I like but I can’t like it because people like me like it and I’m just way too special to be like anyone else so etc etc, downward spiral, THE VOID, etc, soul-crush ego-panic)
Also, these are products and we’re selling them, and that’s capitalism. But that doesn’t mean these products aren’t art. I digress.
June 3, 2008
Insound's Tip Jar: A Sign That "Making Your Money On The Road" May Not Be All That Viable A Strategy →
This post by Maura Johnston, along with the Coolfer post she is quoting and commenting on, is essential reading, especially if you’re the type of chump who honestly believes the internet has had an entirely positive impact on your average touring band.
